Garland defended his choice, stating, “All the people you just mentioned were political, would be political appointees. I appointed somebody who was not a political appointee, somebody who was independent, nonpartisan, with a record of career experience as a prosecutor. That seemed to me the perfect resume for making that kind of decision.”
However, Jordan remained unsatisfied and pressed further, questioning the impartiality of Smith’s past prosecutions and highlighting his interactions with key figures involved in previous IRS controversies. “Did the fact that he was interested in going after the very people who were targeted by the IRS about a decade ago, did that have any influence on your selection?” Jordan queried, presenting an email excerpt suggesting Smith’s keen interest in prosecuting cases related to nonprofit misuse for evading campaign finance laws.
Greek Chicken Gyros
CLASSIC CHERRY DELIGHT
Dive Into Homestyle Comfort: Amish Country Casserole – Rich, Hearty, and Satisfying!
FED UP AND DIRTY: HOW I TAUGHT MY HUSBAND A LESSON ABOUT NEWBORN DUTY
CARROT CAKE SHEET CAKE: A Slice of Sweet Perfection
Elon Musk’s $5,000 Tesla House Unveiled: A Game-Changer in Affordable, Sustainable Living
Beef Stew Recipe
The Easiest Chocolate Chip Squares
Here’s why you should throw salt down the sink before you go on vacation